.Google.com's Martin Splitt answered an inquiry in the s.e.o Workplace Hrs podcast regarding whether reproducing YouTube video content into message on a website will be actually viewed as duplicate content as well as possess a damaging influence on the web page ranks.Although replicate information is actually not an adverse ranking variable, content published on a much more reliable site can trigger the content on the much less authoritative site to be outranked. It is actually a valid inquiry to inquire since content on a reliable will definitely out perform the very same material on a less reliable one.Some in the hunt area pertain to one item of web content usurping the rankings of another as 'cannibalization' of the web page's ranking possibility. This is actually the worry of the individual asking the inquiry.Google.com's Martin Splitt recounted the provided question:." If I generate a YouTube video clip and afterwards take that specific content or content as well as area it on a website page, could Google flag that website page or website for duplicate content?".Various Material Media Are Alleviated As Distinct.Martin Splitt addressed that the two forms of information are actually different as well as will certainly certainly not be actually addressed as the very same content, thereby releasing text message content extracted from a video clip will certainly certainly not be considered replicate content.This is his answer:." Zero, one is a video recording and also the other one is text message material, which would be actually distinct material!".Printing Extracted Text From Video Clip.Martin praised the tip of removing text content coming from a video clip and publishing it as text, keeping in mind that some folks like to eat information in text form instead of seeing a video recording. Switching the flow of content coming from message to sound or even video clip is actually possibly not a negative suggestion likewise due to the fact that some individuals possess problem checking out text information and also may favor listening to it from a video recording or even a podcast style.Martin talked about printing online video content in a textual version:." It is actually additionally not a negative suggestion, some users (like me) might favor a text model as well as others might certainly not have the capacity to use an online video version of the content initially due to data transfer or graphic constraints.".Takeaways.The suggestion responsible for the question is actually repurposing web content as well as it's a good suggestion. Search is actually greater than Google.com, it is actually additionally YouTube and everywhere folks get their audio information, like Spotify. The simple fact that there is actually no cannibalization of the content between tools makes repurposing a feasible method to expanding your material grasp.Listen closely to the podcast at the 8:20 moment mark:.Included Photo through Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.